While the surprising rise and persistence of Donald
Trump has been the story of the year in Republican politics, Trump’s candidacy
was not completely unforeseen. Trump has been involved in national politics for
decades, taking positions on a variety of issues and working with officeholders
from both parties. Though often considered as a candidate in past presidential
elections, he has declined to seek a major party’s nomination until this year.
If he wins in the primaries, Trump will not be the
first businessman with no experience in government to be nominated for
president – Republican Wendell Willkie was nominated under similar
circumstances in 1940, and though he lost to Franklin Roosevelt, the election
was decided by a smaller margin than any of the previous five presidential contests.
Although Trump’s campaign is fueled by
anti-establishment anger, his long history of political involvement, especially
with Hillary Clinton, preclude him from ever running as a true outsider. That
distinction instead belongs to a much more bizarre candidacy – that of Dr. Ben
Carson.
Ben Carson is the ultimate outsider. Like Trump,
Carson appeals to those who are frustrated with the current political system
and who entertain dreams of sending an outsider to Washington to clean it up.
Like Trump, Carson has never held public office. Neither candidate is taken seriously
by the Republican Establishment. But Carson differs from Trump in many
significant ways.
In order to evaluate Carson’s potential as the
leader of the next generation of conservatives, it is necessary to look at three
questions. First, how is he different from all other candidates? Second, why is
he popular? And third, how can he be expected to handle future political
pressures?
We can learn a lot about a candidate by looking at
his or her endorsements. While writing this article, I studied the endorsement
profiles of the eight candidates who made the most recent prime-time debate –
Trump, Carson, Rubio, Cruz, Bush, Fiorina, Kasich, and Paul – counting the
number of current and former United States Senators, Representatives,
Governors, and State Legislators who have declared their endorsement for each
candidate.
Jeb Bush was in the lead among endorsements by
Senators (14), Representatives (38), and Governors (11), which is rather
unsurprising due to his family background and long history of connections with
the party Establishment. Fellow Establishment champion John Kasich came in
second, with Rubio in third place and Cruz in fourth.
However, among state legislators, Cruz is in the
lead with 151 endorsements to Bush’s 131 and Kasich’s 137. As a fierce critic
of the party’s establishment and the big-government Republicans who control both
houses of Congress, it’s little wonder that Cruz is feared and disliked by many
who walk the corridors of power in Washington. Nevertheless, state legislators,
who are far closer to the people they represent, are generally supportive of
Cruz.
In the endorsement primary, Rand Paul comes in fifth
place, Carly Fiorina in sixth, and Donald Trump in seventh. While the majority
of experienced office-holders in both political parties are either terrified of
or disgusted by Trump, he has nevertheless earned the endorsement of former
Representative Virgil Goode of Virginia and 22 state legislators.
And in last place there is Ben Carson, who has been
endorsed by four state legislators, and not a single Senator, Representative,
or Governor. While a certain amount separation from the Establishment may be desirable
in a candidate, it is downright bizarre that one of the most popular candidates
for a nation’s highest office is not supported by any prominent members of its
government.
It seems, therefore, that Carson’s major difference
from the other candidates is his total lack of political credentials or a
political history. Carson had no significant involvement in national politics
until his famous speech at the National Prayer Breakfast in early 2013, less
than three years ago! In that brief time, Carson has made a name for himself by
criticizing the current administration, mainly on Obamacare, which he has
called “the worst thing that has happened in this nation since slavery.”
Ben Carson’s complete lack of political experience,
and his fierce and unapologetic criticism of the current regime, qualify him as
the ultimate outsider. In a year when most voters seem to prefer outsiders,
this has served him well thus far. According to the latest results from Public
Policy Polling, Carson is currently at 19%, behind only Trump, while Ted Cruz
and Marco Rubio have 14% and 13%, respectively, and no one else exceeds 5%.
Why then is Carson so popular? He is, first of all,
an outsider – he appeals to voters who feel that they have been betrayed by
career politicians in both parties, and see the election of a president with no
connection to the political system as the only way to effect positive change.
Second, he says the things that his base wants to hear – in this he is similar
to Trump, and while the two men differ in style, much of their substance is the
same. Third, Ben Carson is nice.
Ben Carson has earned a place in our hearts as the nicest
candidate. (His favorability rating, according to Public Policy Polling, is
+37, higher than any opponent’s.) Carson is a soft-spoken man, who overcame a background
of poverty and racial discrimination to become a world-renowned surgeon, saving
hundreds of lives over the course of his illustrious. His remarkable success
story has earned him universal respect. And now he seems to have embraced conservative ideology in its entirety.
Ben Carson is universally liked and admired, and accordingly
he has benefited from a significant polling boom at this early point in the
season. Nevertheless, his lack of political experience or credentials should be
a cause for suspicion – can he be and do what he says he will be and do? Can he
accomplish the things that true conservatives desire from a president? Thus the
third question, how can Ben Carson be expected to handle political pressure?
At this point, it is impossible to say with any
degree of certainty what kind of a president Carson would be. He has no
political history. All politicians begin as outsiders, but sad experience has
shown that most of them, upon taking office, abandon the principles on which
they were elected and fall in with the bipartisan Establishment, serving the interests
of political class rather than the people whom they represent. While there is
no reason to question Carson’s character, at a trying time like this, good
intentions are hardly enough. The only candidate that can be trusted to fight
the establishment is one who has fought the establishment, and Carson, with his
total lack of experience, is not that candidate.
Ben Carson is running for president as celebrity,
gaining support because he is universally liked and respected for of his many
great accomplishments in the medical field. And while neurosurgery may be a
more honorable profession than that of a celebrity musician, actor,
or athlete, it is not any more relevant to the duties of the President of the
United States. Carson has provided conservatives with an inspiring story and
strong rhetoric, but so far he has done nothing to show that he is ready for national
leadership.
Ben Carson’s political views are, in effect, the
views of a child. The brevity of his involvement in politics means that he lacks
the essential experience of hearing challenges to his opinions and refining his
views as he comes into contact with more people and ideologies. Much that he
believes is admirable, but at this point, his understanding of the issues is
too shallow to withstand serious criticism.
Consider the comments Carson made last spring, when
asked by a reporter whether he believed that sexual orientation is a choice. “Absolutely,”
said Carson. “Because a lot of people who go into prison go into prison
straight — and when they come out, they’re gay.” Later that day, Carson
apologized and rescinded his statement.
Whether Carson’s statement is accurate is of
secondary importance – what matters here is that, as soon as he realized that what
he had said was very controversial, he changed his mind about the issue. Carson did
something similar when pressed over a comment to the effect that Obamacare was
worse than slavery, explaining that what he actually meant was that Obamacare
was worse than 9/11. Holding unusual political opinions that melt away at the
first sign of criticism is something one would expect from a precocious youth,
but hardly from a presidential candidate.
If nominated for President, Ben Carson would likely
change his views many times in his struggle to win acceptance with wider blocs
of voters. If he could overcome his unfamiliarity with the political process
and actually become the next president, Americans could look forward to four
years of unpredictable rule with their callow commander-in-chief repeatedly reversing
his positions in a futile attempt to bring harmony to the disparate interests
that govern Washington. In the end, Carson would prove to be an unprecedentedly
weak president, as his good intentions and expert knowledge of neurosurgery could
do nothing to take actual policy decisions out of the hands of ill-disposed men
in both parties whose political acumen far exceeds Carson’s feeble talents.
Ben Carson may be the most likeable of the
candidates now vying for the presidency. He may have the most inspiring
personal history. And he is certainly the ultimate outsider. But, in the end,
these are not the qualities that the conservative movement – or the nation –
needs in a leader. The battle lines are drawn, the enemy will broke with no
compromise, and our side could do nothing worse than to choose an inexperienced
commander. Ben Carson is an honorable man with good intentions, and
conservatives are fortunate to have him on their side. Nevertheless, he is not,
at this time, ready to take on the unique duties and challenges of the
Presidency.
No comments:
Post a Comment